Sunday, December 31, 2017

Pierre de Coubertin: creator of the Modern Olympics

Coubertin’s Mosaic

In 1896, Baron Pierre de Coubertin created the Modern Olympic Games. The Olympic motto, "Citius, Altius, Fortius," meaning Swifter, Higher, Stronger, was borrowed by Coubertin from Father Henri Martin Dideon, the headmaster of Arcueil College in Paris, in a speech given to describe the great achievements of the athletes at his school. Another informal motto used by Coubertin came from a sermon made by the Bishop of Pennsylvania during the 1908 London Games: "The most important thing is not to win but to take part!" (Wikipedia website, Olympic Symbols) 

The Latin motto with its comparative adjectives pushing insistently for more of everything translates unusually well to the Postmodern Olympics—faster moving storylines, more thrilling video, and a firmer hold over the audience across the communications ether—seems apt as a slogan and business plan for the electronic version of the  Olympic Games as we know them today. The TV Olympics strives for more viewers, more expensive commercial time, and greater visibility for the host city. Coubertin, an educator at his essence, studied the educational systems of Britain and America and their emphasis on physical culture and games with the goal of reforming the rigid French pedagogy. Coubertin switched his attention from reforming the French educational system to creating the Modern Olympics but retained the same high-mindedness idealism for his new pursuit.

Coubertin was so closely identified with reviving the Olympics that he was president of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) from 1896-1925 and made Honorary President upon his retirement. Upon his death, Coubertin’s heart was interred in a marble monument at Olympia commemorating him as father of the Modern Olympics. The dramatic gesture of placing Coubertin’s heart in Olympia possesses religious overtones. Coubertin's passion for developing an improbable dream into a  quadrennial international gathering resulted in a grand achievement, one of enormous social and political relevance. The addition of a Winter Olympic Games, starting in 1924, made the Olympics a biennial event

The Olympic Games, primarily a television experience since the 1950s, corrals the viewers at home in a digitized, massaged and manipulated format, the ultimate expression of the television director’s art. Coubertin’s egalitarian Olympic message somehow survives and reflects Coubertin talent for pragmatism. Coubertin’s enduring optimism against triumphed over the resistance to the Modern Games. The Olympic paradigm, established by Coubertin, with its lofty principles of health, education and world peace, hopefully continues despite the commercialization of the Games.

Coubertin established a mosaic-like structure for the Games and fully understood the importance of symbolism, particularly in the choice of Athens as a first locale for the Modern Olympics. The Modern Olympics had a surprisingly auspicious start in Athens, Coubertin having gained the endorsement of the Greek royal family and the citizens. The Greeks rallied with some of the enthusiasm that characterizes the joyfulness of the host city to the present day. Interestingly, 1896 Athens greeted the event with a flair for symbolism not usually associated with sports events. Homes were decorated with colorful streamers and banners indicated the letters O.A., the Greek initials for Olympic Games, and the numbers 776 B.C. and 1896 A.D., the dates indicating the beginning year for ancient Games and for the new Modern Olympics. (MacAloon 208) Symbolism and a sense of historic grandeur would accompany later Olympic gatherings and reflect Coubertin’s desire for establishing more than a sports competition.

The Opening Ceremony, full of a theatrical grandeur not associated with sports competition, showed a marketer’s instincts for symbolism and drama. The Opening Ceremony provides a festive Act I, followed by Act II and the sports competition and Act III completion with the marathon race and  Closing Ceremony. Coubertin’s Act II inspiration was to take advantage of the luster of history and with “Athletics” events, the term for the track and field events connected to the ancient Games and expand the number and variety of events to include swimming, gymnastics, cycling, wrestling, shooting,  and tennis. The increased palette of sports guaranteed a wide public appeal, not to mention the likelihood of a wider spectrum of winners from the 14 participating nations.


American athletes succeeded mightily at the first Modern Olympic but the Games reached a crescendo of success when a finally a Greek athlete, Spiridon Louis, crossed the finish line as winner. Louis was triumphant in the marathon, the event possessing the most symbolic import for Greeks and every host city needs a hero to call their own. First and second place winner were awarded silver medals, and an olive branch and laurel branch respectively. The awarding of medals occurred at the end of the 1896 Games and provided an exciting Act III finale to go along with the Closing Ceremony. Coubertin had created a template for an Olympics dense with tradition, symbolism and drama that lasts to the current day. (Official Souvenir Program, Centennial Olympic Games)

Tuesday, December 26, 2017

"All The Money in the World" doesn't guarantee a good seat

I realized "All the Money in the World" was about the kidnapping of John Paul Getty III in 1973 in Rome, Italy and had to see it. I lived in Rome earlier that year. Those were the days of hippies, revolution and street demonstrations. Rome had all of that along with its ancient sites, charming plazas and  colorful neighborhoods; the Colosseum, Piazza Navona and the Trastevere were some of my favorites.

I made it to the cinema on Christmas day, the first day of the film's release.

The news that Christopher Plummer had replaced Kevin Spacey in the role of billionaire patriarch John Paul Getty peaked my interest even further. Plummer looked good in the previews. The NY Times said he dominated the film-- not bad for an 88 year old actor!

More intrigue... the reason Ridley Scott replaced Kevin Spacey was the sexual scandal brewing around the star of "House of Cards". Careers die fast in the electronic world.  Director Scott didn't want Spacey's alleged sexual misconduct to intrude on the viewing experience. Scott re-shot Spacey's scene with Christopher Plummer in a mere 11 days. Pretty nimble response.

Ridley Scott, age 80, and Christopher Plummer may or may not get Oscar nominations. The men deserve to share this year's Outstanding Senior Citizen Cinematic award for achievement by an octogenarian in a major Hollywood motion picture.

Went to see the film at one of the deluxe theater chains-- this one called iPic Theaters. Their tagline is "the ultimate theater experience." The Austin iPic is located in the Domain Shopping Center-- a successful shopping mall with the contemporary mix of retail and residential buildings. We paid $14.00 per seat for our inferior category seats. The super premium seats were sold out. Or so we were led to believe.

The iPic is setup for more than movie viewing-- there's decent food, a high-toned bar and even some pool tables. And the crowd on Christmas night was a nice mix of well-heeled folks in a festive holiday mood. My wife ordered the Tandoori chicken skewers and we settled into our seats.

Unfortunately our seats were in the very first row! Our noses seemed pressed very close to the movie screen. We looked back at the theater, full of plush leather chairs and noticed many unfilled seats. Why had we been limited to the first row, we wondered. Turns out you can reserve a  movie ticket and then not show up to see the film. iPic's computer system is not nimble enough to indicate which seats are truly available. So we had the worst seats in the house. The Tandoori chicken was passable.

"All the Money in the World" earns a thumbs up. Plummer as John Paul Getty is a high point, along with Mark Wahlberg, as Getty's hired security man. The Italian vibe, complete with Mafioso participants in the kidnapping, is nicely done. Not sure if the film presentation is all quite factual....?

Read  John Pearson’s 1995 book “Painfully Rich: The Outrageous Fortune and Misfortunes of the Heirs of J. Paul Getty” to get the full story.

The iPic claim of the "ultimate theater experience" didn't hold up this time-- but I liked the experience enough to go back. Next time we will reserve seats a little further back.

Recommended: 
For residents and visitors in Los Angeles-- look into a visit to the Getty Roman Villa in Malibu, California. Amazingly, John Paul Getty had his facsimile of an ancient Roman villa designed and built without setting foot in California for the construction. The project is referenced towards the end of the film.

Wednesday, December 20, 2017

Alec Baldwin: is he right for a talk show?

Alec Baldwin is in discussions with ABC about developing a talk show for the network. Whether Baldwin gets a daytime show or nighttime show has yet to be determined. Alec Baldwin may not be the right personality type to host a talk show.

Baldwin has a personal history fraught with beefs. The list of Baldwin adversaries includes quite a spectrum; from PETA-style confrontations with Central Park horse-drawn carriage drivers to a very nasty marital breakup with Kim Basinger.

In the space of just the last few months we have 3 Alec Baldwin incidents to report:

1)  Alec called a guy in a black SUV a “meatball” and for apparently driving his car down a New York City street in a manner Alec found displeasing.
2)  Alec got arrested for riding his bike the wrong way on Fifth Avenue. He got angry with the arresting officer. An Irish-American like Baldwin should know better than to denigrate New York City cops.
3)  Alec took on the #MeToo movement and got in an inflammatory email exchange with Asia Argento, Rose McGowan, and Anthony Bourdain. Any male taking on the Me Too movement in a less than supportive way reveals his masochistic tendencies. Or maybe, Alec is just argumentative….?

The “hot” side of Alec Baldwin may not work for the role of talk show host. By “hot” I don’t mean good-looking. Baldwin looks great on TV. The “hot-headed side of Baldwin hints he is not a good fit for the interviewer’s spot in the world of TV talk. The hot attributes I see in Alec Baldwin mean that his presentation style may be too intense for the talk show format.

Here is what Marshall McLuhan said on the topic of the talk:

·      The talk show host offers a “low-pressure style of presentation.”
(Understanding Media 310)

·      The talk show welcomes the viewer through the use of “spontaneous casualness.” The viewer, deeply involved in a cool medium, closes the TV image.
(Understanding Media 317)

Think about the Late Night talk show hosts through history and you get a list of low pressure presenters:

Steve Allen
Johnny Carson
Merv Griffin
David Letterman
Jay Leno
Jimmy Kimmel
Jimmy Fallon
Seth Meyers

Stephen Colbert is not a classic low-key presenter. On The Daily Show, Colbert developed a high-intensity persona, a faux right wing, Bill O’Reilly knock-off. Colbert got his own show. The show moved at a NASCAR pace. Doing his rapid fire interviews on the Colbert Report Colbert steam rolled guests, always going for the comedy jugular.

Alec Baldwin’s suitability as a talk show host remains to be seen. He has moved into the spotlight. Doing Donald Trump on SNL Baldwin has achieved cult status across America. Alec’s confidence is flying high, but he must come down to earth to become a skilled talk show host.

Baldwin’s personality traits will determine the outcome. Success does not hinge solely on good looks; nor  even on intelligence and a great sense of humor. Baldwin is strong in all these regards.

More important than comic brilliance, is the tone of the show emanating from the host. Baldwin goes awry if gets too opinionated and self-centered. A self-centered, grandiose host does not win the love of the audience.

The overly opinionated host brands himself as just too hot for the medium. The Rush Limbaughs of the world do not work on TV. David Letterman mastered the art of interviewing guests without pre-judging. Dave’s opinions came across subtly, especially as he matured as a performer. 

Alec Baldwin, must come across as a low key presenter. The nurturant male host supports and listens to his guests. There must be genuine interest in the other person.

Baldwin’s approach to his guests will determine his show’s ratings and success. He cannot be that guy that argues with guys in the street and gets in disputes with cops.

Time will tell. Stay tuned…


Friday, December 15, 2017

The Jester vs the King (Al Franken vs Donald Trump)



Al Franken is the Jester. He had a political career but it came to a crashing halt. “Off with his head,” says the angry King when the Jester’s jokes fall flat. Franken’s head came off due to a photo. A picture is worth 1,000 words, after all.

Leeann Tweeden held a photo of Franken making believe he was grabbing her breasts while she slept in a Kevlar vest and wearing a helmet. Not really a sexy photo. Franken looks directly at the camera lens, hamming it up like a true jester. The two participated together in a skit as part of a 2006 USO gig—a worthy effort for which Franken has paid dearly.

Tweeden held on to the photo for 11 years. It serves as supporting material for her claims against Franken. She maintains Al Franken attempted to kiss her in skit rehearsals and that she soundly rejected those advances. Franken remembers it a different way.

A few weeks elapsed, more Franken stories emerged revealing his penchant for grabbing women’s asses during photo shoots. What is it with Franken and photos? The camera seems to bring out the worst in the guy. This is truly nerdy behavior. And Franken himself provided a map to recognizing his nerdiness.

Remember Stuart Smalley, the fey character invented by Franken in 1991 for Saturday Night Live (SNL)? Smalley’s most famous affirmation… “I’m good enough, I’m smart enough and doggone it, people like me”… reveals deep feelings of inadequacy. Comedy is all about truth. Franken revealed his own deep personal insecurities.

Maybe Al Franken really is Stuart Smalley. Smalley… the name itself implies a lack of potency. Smallness is exactly the wrong personality to survive a tidal wave of criticism. His own Democratic party created a tipping point. Must have hurt Franken deeply when fellow Democratic senators—particularly Kirsten Gillibrand of New York—called for his resignation. Al Franken, the duly elected Senator from Minnesota, resigned soon after.

Meanwhile, King Donald Trump handled a Gillibrand attack a very different way. Gillibrand suggested Trump should resign the presidency for sexual harassment stories surrounding him for years. King Donald followed his ethos, when you get hit, hit back harder at your opponent and show no mercy.

Trump tweeted:

“Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Charles E. Schumer and someone who would come to my office 'begging' for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump,” the president wrote. “Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!”

Trump’s tweet questions Gillibrand’s fitness for office-- calling her a lightweight. Trump depicts Gillibrand soliciting money from Trump for her political campaigns. He demeans her further suggesting she “would do anything” for the money.

Trump implies Gillibrand would have considered offering sexual favors in exchange for money. He goes right to sexuality but turns the tables with Gillibrand as a possible exploiter and trafficker in sexual favors. Ah, the genius of the Tweeter in Chief. His great skills are:

1)  branding the Trump name
2)   branding others with insulting nicknames
3)   seeking out conflict

Whereas most of us seek peace in our relationships, Trump relishes conflict. Trump, the contrarian and TV producer, knows that every story needs conflict. The classic Hollywood story pits two adversaries against each other. The arrow of rising conflict between adversaries always points upward.

Trump gets his enemies back on their heels. He keeps himself prominent in the story—never backs off and never acknowledges defeat.

Compare Trump’s aggression to Al Franken’s passivity in response to the accusations level against him. Franken seems guilty of being a nerd. Not just a nerd… but a nerd extraordinaire. He lacked game when it came to women. Franken’s victims did not offer horror stories about him. His sins seemed more like the antics of a middle schooler kid ill-equipped to handle a conversation with a girl or woman.

The Jester was just not suited to do battle. Jester’s prefer peace, striving to tell the truth about a situation as a way to defuse the discomfort.

As Marshall McLuhan said many times, humor is about societal grievance. The comedian finds the areas where society is most vulnerable, like race relations, and scratches that itch. Comedians are essentially peace-makers. Al Franken’s peaceful path, the Stuart Smalley jokes and ironic humor, did not work for keeping his job.

The Jester left with his head cut-off. The angry King still stands waving his sword at any rival. Kirsten Gillibrand had the temerity to challenge the king. He came back hard and viciously. Trump brings everything back to Trump—and keeps the cosmos in order with himself as the Sun, the center of gravitational force.

Monday, December 4, 2017

Trump the De-stabilizer

Let’s turn to the Merriman-Webster dictionary for a definition of the word destabilize.

Destabilize—transitive verb; 1. To make unstable; 2 to cause (something such as a government) to be incapable of functioning or surviving.

Fareed Zakaria, host of a Sunday morning show on CNN, interviewed a journalist from Iran last week. The journalist didn’t speak perfect English. Fareed asked “what do people in Iran think of Donald Trump?”

“Instable,” the reporter answered. He meant to say “unstable” but his meaning was clear. “Donald Trump is instable and he is making America instable…” he continued. He used instable rather than saying “Trump is de-stablizing America.” Ah ha, I thought. I think this gentleman has captured the essence of Mr. Donald Trump. His goal is to “destabilize” each and every situation to his own advantage.

The President of the United States has immense power. We look to the president to add stability. We presume the president reached his position through great skill and experience. The president should be the epitome of—stability. He or she shares that great equanimity with the entire nation and the entire globe. The center of the Free World is Washington DC. We want everything to revolved around the White House. The president is a center of gravity holding reality, politics, war, conflict and peaceful resolution in the center of his hand. But this time it’s different. Donald Trump seeks instability in every situation.

Trump just declared against the FBI. The FBI is in tatters and only Donald the Great can restore the department to its former glory. Strange?! Critics say the morale of FBI agents will fall precipitously because the boss said they suck… Donald throws everybody over like a jiu jitsu master. Everybody is an enemy and he has to keep the adversaries off their stride. He has to destabilize them.

Donald Trump thrives on conflict, while most people avoid conflict as much as possible. We wonder about his motive. My guess is the destabilization technique comes from his business experience. I’ve never read “Art of the Deal” but I probably should. Keep your negotiating adversary off-guard, nudge him out of his game, push him out of his comfort zone. Maybe Trump’s goal is money and making money. His job description is to lead the USA but Trump always has his eye on the dollar bill.

A real estate friend of mine told me—“your power in any house buying decision is the ability to walk away from the deal. Trump alienates all comers. He’s always walking away from the deal.

A few tidbits… heard a radio caller describe Sarah Huckabee Sanders as “a sassy diner waitress type.” That’s hysterical.

The same radio show featured Major Garrett talking about the White House press briefings, now go-to viewing. Sarah Huckabee Sanders is just too entertaining.

Major Garrett said reporters, like him, “stormed the ramparts” to pin Sara Sanders to the truth.

The same caller on the show I mentioned above described the reporters as “obsequious.” You decide….

Word Nerd section:

3 Vocabulary words:
1.   Epitome-- embodiment
2.   equanimity—evenness of mind
3.   obsequious—fawning attentiveness

I used to be a Language Arts/Reading teach